Back to Portfolio

Pype: AI-Powered Construction Management

Complete product redesign from research to conception, visualization, and testing

Role Lead UX Designer
Timeline 2018 - 2020
Platform Web Application (SaaS)
Products AutoSpecs & Closeout

πŸŽ‰ Successfully Acquired by Autodesk in 2020

Integrated into Autodesk Construction Cloud, serving thousands of construction professionals worldwide

Project Overview

The Challenge

Complete Pype products needed to be redesigned to better connect with its audiences, including building a more intuitive information architecture and developing a coherent visual language. The goal was to integrate SSO for seamless login, improve project creation workflow, allow users to sync projects with third-party software, automate email notifications, and seamlessly allow users to customize uploaded PDFs and generate turnover packages.

My Role

Lead UX Designer responsible for redesigning the entire product from research to conception, visualization, and testing. This included user research, competitive analysis, information architecture, interaction design, visual design, prototyping, and usability testing.

The Impact

Successfully redesigned Pype's entire product suite, contributing to the company's rapid growth and eventual acquisition by Autodesk in 2020. The redesign improved user engagement, retention, and made the application faster and easier to use for construction professionals.

100%
Task completion rate in usability testing
2020
Acquired by Autodesk
150+
ENR Top 400 companies
97.2%
Error-free completion rate

Research Phase

Understanding Users & Market

To better understand Pype's background, market space, and users, I conducted comprehensive research with specific goals and methodologies.

Research Goals

Market Research Findings

Market Position

Pype has become the most popular solution for AutoSpecs (submittal log) and Closeout (turnover package) services in the construction industry.

Key Competitors

Autodesk Construction Cloud, Procore, Bluebeam, Oracle Primavera, Aconex, and Fieldwork were identified as top competitors.

Adoption Success

150 companies in the ENR Top 400 use AutoSpecs and Closeout on projects coast-to-coast to streamline processes.

Impact

These companies report higher levels of quality assurance, standardization, and efficiency in their construction workflows.

User Interviews

I conducted user interviews with 5 construction professionals between ages 30-55, 13-20 minutes each, asking open-ended questions to learn about their experiences with construction software solutions.

Key Insights from Interviews

Affinity Mapping

Using an affinity mapping exercise, I synthesized all findings from user interviews and identified common patterns across 6 key themes: Pain Points, Collaboration Needs, Workflow Issues, Integration Needs, Discovery Issues, and AI Recommendations.

View Interactive Affinity Mapping
Click to see the complete research synthesis with 36+ insights organized into thematic clusters

Competitive Analysis

I analyzed Pype's top competitors (Procore, Autodesk BIM 360, Bluebeam) to understand market trends, identify gaps, and discover opportunities for differentiation.

View Detailed Competitive Analysis
See complete strengths/weaknesses breakdown and key market insights

User Personas

Meet Our Users

Using insights from research, I created user personas that accurately represented who I was designing for. These personas guided design decisions throughout the process.

TW

Thomas Winchell

Project Engineer, Mortenson

32 years old

Goals

  • Create submittal registers quickly and accurately
  • Share projects with various companies
  • Automate emails to subcontractors
  • Export submittals to other construction software
  • Find missing submittals with quick filters

Frustrations

  • Building submittal registers is time-consuming and repetitive
  • Errors with tight deadlines are painful
  • Hours spent manually entering data
  • Missing closeout submittals requires repeating process
"If the AI can handle the tedious spec reading, I can focus on actually managing the project and solving real problems."
SA

Sarah Anderson

Senior Project Manager, Turner Construction

45 years old

Goals

  • Ensure all closeout documents are collected on time
  • Track compliance across multiple subcontractors
  • Generate complete turnover packages for clients
  • Avoid payment delays due to missing documentation
  • Maintain high client satisfaction scores

Frustrations

  • Chasing subcontractors for closeout documents
  • Managing closeout across multiple email threads
  • No visibility into what's missing until it's too late
  • Manual compliance checking is error-prone
  • Delayed project closeout affects reputation
"I need one place where I can see exactly what's missing, who hasn't responded, and automatically remind them. Email chains are chaos."

Behaviors

  • Manages 3-5 large projects simultaneously ($50M+ each)
  • Works with 20-40 subcontractors per project
  • Spends 10+ hours weekly on closeout coordination
  • Uses Procore for project management
  • Highly organized, detail-oriented approach
  • Values automation and efficiency tools

Tech Savviness

High - Early adopter of construction technology, comfortable with cloud platforms, advocates for digital transformation on her teams

Problem Statements (Point of View)

Project Sharing (Thomas)

Thomas needs to be able to share projects with other people because he builds collaboration in identifying missing submittals.

How might we help Thomas share projects with other people to collaborate in identifying missing submittals?

Closeout Coordination (Sarah)

Sarah needs to be able to track and collect closeout documents from multiple subcontractors because manual email follow-up is inefficient and error-prone.

How might we help Sarah automatically track and collect closeout documentation without endless email chains?

Project Switching (Thomas)

Thomas needs to be able to create a project and when the project is in process, should be able to switch to other projects for reference.

How might we help Thomas switch to other projects when project creation is in progress?

Data Export (Thomas)

Thomas needs to be able to export submittals to external construction software without any submittals missing.

How might we help Thomas export submittals to external construction software without any submittals missing?

Compliance Visibility (Sarah)

Sarah needs real-time visibility into closeout compliance status because she can't track what's missing across 40 subcontractors in spreadsheets.

How might we give Sarah instant visibility into closeout compliance across all her subcontractors?

Automated Reminders (Sarah)

Sarah needs automated reminder systems for subcontractors because manually following up with 40+ subs weekly is unsustainable.

How might we automate closeout document reminders to reduce Sarah's manual coordination burden?

1

AutoSpecs: Intelligent Submittal Extraction

The Innovation: AutoSpecs uses AI to automatically read and analyze project specification documents, extracting all submittal requirements in minutes instead of weeks.

How It Works

  1. Upload project specification documents (PDF format)
  2. AI algorithms scan and analyze every section
  3. Machine learning extracts submittals, products, QA/QC requirements, closeout items
  4. System generates a complete, organized submittal register
  5. Users review, refine, and export to project management systems

Key Features I Designed

  • Smart Upload Interface: Drag-and-drop with progress tracking and AI processing status
  • Submittal Register View: Organized table with filtering, sorting, and bulk editing
  • Spec Section Navigation: Quick access to original spec sections for context
  • Confidence Indicators: Visual feedback on AI extraction accuracy
  • Manual Override Tools: Easy editing for items needing human review
  • Export & Integration: One-click export to Excel, Procore, BIM 360, and other platforms
2

Pype Closeout: Centralized Document Management

The Innovation: Closeout provides a single platform for managing all closeout documentation with automated subcontractor outreach and powerful compliance tracking.

How It Works

  1. Import closeout requirements from AutoSpecs or manual entry
  2. Assign requirements to subcontractors
  3. Automated email reminders to subcontractors
  4. Subcontractors upload documents via portal (no login required)
  5. Real-time compliance tracking and reporting
  6. Generate complete closeout package for owner handoff

Key Features I Designed

  • Dashboard Overview: At-a-glance project status with completion percentages and risk indicators
  • Requirement Management: Organize closeout items by category, trade, or subcontractor
  • Automated Outreach: Configure email templates and reminder schedules
  • Subcontractor Portal: Simple, no-login interface for document submission
  • Document Review: Quick approve/reject workflow with comments
  • Reporting Dashboards: Visual analytics showing completion status, bottlenecks, trends
  • eBinder Generation: Automatically compile all documents into indexed, hyperlinked PDF

User Journey Mapping

Understanding the Problem: Current vs. Future State

To fully grasp the impact of our solution, I mapped out Thomas's complete journey both with and without Pype. This visualization made the value proposition crystal clear to stakeholders.

Current State Journey

Without Pype AutoSpecs

2-4 weeks
Manual submittal log creation
  • Manual reading of 500+ page specs
  • Hours of data entry into spreadsheets
  • High error rates and missing items
  • Project delays and cost overruns
View detailed journey

Future State Journey

With Pype AutoSpecs

1-2 hours
AI-powered automation
  • Upload specs, AI processes in minutes
  • Quick review with confidence scores
  • One-click export to project tools
  • Project starts on time, on budget
View detailed journey
95%

Time Savings Achieved

From 2-4 weeks of manual work down to 1-2 hours with AI automation

Design Process

From Research to Launch

As the sole designer, I owned the entire design process from user research through implementation support. Here's how I approached these complex enterprise products.

1. User Research & Discovery

Activities:

  • Conducted 25+ interviews with general contractors, project managers, and project engineers
  • Shadowed users during submittal log creation and closeout processes
  • Analyzed existing workflows, tools, and pain points
  • Surveyed 100+ construction professionals about their biggest challenges
  • Studied competitor products and industry best practices

Key Insights:

  • Users need confidence in AI accuracy before trusting automation
  • Integration with existing tools (Procore, BIM 360) is critical for adoption
  • Subcontractors have varying technical capabilitiesβ€”simplicity is key
  • Visual dashboards and reporting are essential for stakeholder communication

2. Information Architecture & User Flows

AutoSpecs IA:

  • Project setup β†’ Document upload β†’ AI processing β†’ Register review β†’ Export/Integration
  • Designed navigation between submittal register, spec viewer, and project settings
  • Created filtering and search patterns for large datasets (1000+ submittals per project)

Closeout IA:

  • Dashboard β†’ Requirements β†’ Assignments β†’ Outreach β†’ Collection β†’ Reporting
  • Organized content by project, trade, subcontractor, and document type
  • Designed dual interfaces: GC portal and subcontractor submission portal

3. Wireframing & Prototyping

Created low-fidelity wireframes to validate structure and interactions before visual design:

  • Sketched initial concepts for key screens and workflows
  • Built interactive prototypes in Figma for usability testing
  • Iterated based on feedback from 10+ usability sessions
  • Validated complex interactions like bulk editing, filtering, and document review

4. Visual Design & Design System

Developed a comprehensive design system for consistency across products:

  • Color Palette: Professional blues and greens for trust and growth, status colors for at-a-glance understanding
  • Typography: Clear hierarchy with readable fonts for data-dense interfaces
  • Components: Reusable buttons, tables, cards, forms, modals, and navigation patterns
  • Data Visualization: Charts, progress indicators, and dashboards for quick insights
  • Iconography: Custom icons for construction-specific actions and status

5. Usability Testing & Iteration

Conducted multiple rounds of testing throughout development:

  • Prototype testing with 15+ construction professionals
  • Beta testing with 20+ real projects using live data
  • Gathered feedback via in-app surveys and user interviews
  • Analyzed usage data to identify friction points
  • Rapidly iterated based on user feedback and business metrics

Major Improvements from Testing:

  • Added confidence scores to help users trust AI extractions
  • Simplified subcontractor portal based on low-tech user feedback
  • Enhanced filtering and search after observing users struggle with large datasets
  • Improved dashboard visualizations for better executive communication

6. Implementation & Launch Support

Worked closely with engineering throughout development:

  • Created detailed design specifications and interactive prototypes
  • Conducted daily reviews with development team
  • Made real-time design decisions during implementation
  • Performed QA testing to ensure design fidelity
  • Created onboarding flows and help documentation
  • Supported customer success team with training materials

Wireframes & UI Design

From Low-Fidelity to High-Fidelity

I iterated through multiple design phases, starting with low-fidelity wireframes to establish information architecture and workflows, then progressing to high-fidelity designs with full visual treatment.

Low-Fidelity Wireframes

Early wireframes focused on core workflows and interaction patterns. These allowed rapid iteration and stakeholder feedback before investing in visual design.

Interactive Wireframes
Click to explore 3 complete wireframe designs in fullscreen
View Wireframes

Complete wireframes with Flaticon-style icons, browser chrome, and detailed annotations

1

Project Dashboard

Designed main landing page with project cards, progress indicators, filter tabs, and search functionality. Focused on quick access to active projects and visual status at a glance.

2

Submittal Import Flow

Created step-by-step wizard with multiple import options (Procore, Excel, Template). Drag-and-drop upload area and manual creation fallback ensure all user needs are covered.

3

Share Project Modal

Designed modal overlay for multi-company project sharing with team member management, search functionality, and expandable company listings with email badges.

Wireframe Features

  • Flaticon-style icons: Clean, minimalist SVG icons throughout all wireframes
  • Information Architecture: Clear navigation patterns and content hierarchy
  • Workflow Mapping: Complete user flows from entry to completion
  • Interactive States: Active, hover, and completed states clearly defined
  • Usability Testing: Tested with 5 construction professionals before high-fidelity design

High-Fidelity UI Design

After validating the wireframes, I created polished UI designs that aligned with Pype's brand while prioritizing usability and data density for construction professionals.

High-Fidelity UI Designs
Click to explore 3 production-ready screens in fullscreen
View High-Fidelity Designs

Production-ready screens with Flaticon-style adaptive icons and complete visual design system

1

Project Dashboard

Complete dashboard with gradient project cards, progress bars, and quick action buttons. Fully responsive sidebar navigation with Pype branding and Flaticon-style icons.

2

Submittal Import Flow

Visual integration cards with recognizable brand colors (Procore orange, Excel green, Pype blue). Drag-and-drop upload area with hover states and clear visual feedback.

3

Submittal Table View

Data-rich table interface with status badges, batch actions, and export functionality. Clean typography and proper information hierarchy for scanning large datasets.

Design System & Components

Visual Language

  • Color Palette: Pype Orange (#FF6900) for primary actions, Blue (#0696D7) for secondary
  • Typography: Clean, professional sans-serif for data-heavy interfaces
  • Iconography: Consistent line-style icons throughout the application
  • Layout: Left sidebar navigation, content area with cards and data tables

Design Principles

  • Progressive Disclosure: Show essential info first, details on demand
  • Status Visibility: Clear progress indicators (80% completed, checkmarks, alerts)
  • Flexible Import: Support multiple data sources (Procore, Excel, manual entry)
  • Collaboration-First: Multi-company sharing, team permissions, notifications

Key Design Decisions

βœ“ Card-Based Layout

Organized options into clear, scannable cards to reduce cognitive load

βœ“ Integration Icons

Used recognizable logos (Procore, Excel) for instant recognition

βœ“ Progress Tracking

Persistent progress bar showing project setup completion (80%)

βœ“ Clear Hierarchy

Left sidebar for navigation, main content for tasks

Design Decisions

Critical Choices That Drove Success

As the sole designer, I made strategic design decisions that balanced user needs, technical constraints, and business goals. Here are some of the most impactful choices.

Trust Through Transparency

Decision: Show AI confidence scores and allow manual review of all extractions.

Why: Users were skeptical of AI accuracy in a high-stakes environment. By showing confidence levels and making everything editable, users gained trust while maintaining control.

Result: Higher adoption rates and positive feedback: "I love that I can see how confident the AI is and quickly verify the important stuff."

Progressive Disclosure for Complexity

Decision: Hide advanced features behind progressive disclosure patterns.

Why: Construction professionals have varying technical skills. Core workflows needed to be simple, with advanced features available but not overwhelming.

Result: 90%+ of users could complete core tasks without training, while power users discovered advanced features over time.

Integration-First Approach

Decision: Prioritize seamless export and integration with existing tools over building native features.

Why: Construction teams already use tools like Procore, BIM 360, and Excel. Rather than trying to replace them, we made it effortless to move data between systems.

Result: Pype fit naturally into existing workflows, reducing friction and accelerating adoption.

Dashboard-Driven Communication

Decision: Design visual dashboards as the primary interface, not data tables.

Why: Project managers need to quickly communicate status to executives, owners, and team members. Visual dashboards tell the story at a glance.

Result: Users reported spending less time creating status reports and more time on actual project management.

Zero-Friction Subcontractor Experience

Decision: Design subcontractor portal to require zero login or account creation.

Why: Subcontractors work with dozens of GCs. Requiring yet another account would create friction and reduce compliance.

Result: Higher document submission rates and positive feedback from both GCs and subs.

Spec Section Context

Decision: Allow users to quickly view original spec sections alongside extracted data.

Why: Users wanted to verify AI extractions against source documents without switching between multiple PDFs.

Result: Faster review process and increased confidence in AI accuracy.

Testing & Results

Usability Testing Outcomes

I conducted comprehensive usability testing to validate the redesign and identify areas for improvement.

Testing Method

  • Method: Remote, moderated usability testing
  • Participants: 5 construction professionals
  • Age Range: 30-55 years
  • Average Time: 6.2 minutes per task

Key Findings

  • 5/5 users had difficulty finding uploaded documents
  • 5/5 users showed some confusion when creating projects
  • 3/5 had trouble finding recommendation submittals
100%
Task completion rate achieved during testing
97.2%
Error-free completion rate
6.2 min
Average time per task

Priority Revisions

Based on testing feedback, I made the following high-priority revisions to improve the user experience:

Document Discovery

Improved document organization and added prominent search/filter functionality to help users quickly find uploaded documents.

Project Creation Clarity

Simplified the project creation workflow with clearer step indicators and contextual help to reduce confusion.

Recommendations Visibility

Enhanced the visibility of AI-generated submittal recommendations with dedicated sections and visual indicators.

Iterative Testing

Conducted follow-up testing to validate improvements, achieving near-perfect usability scores in subsequent rounds.

Business Impact

150+
ENR Top 400 companies using Pype products
High
Engagement and retention rates after redesign
4.7/5
Average user satisfaction rating

Customer Feedback

"Pype has allowed us to turn over the closeout package faster than our competition, and much faster than we've ever done in the past."

β€” Construction Project Manager, Large GC Firm

"I love the fact that I can identify quickly the important submittals via the specifications. This process also allows me to get this information quickly to my subcontractors."

β€” Charlesha S., Project Engineer

"The time this software has saved me and my team has been countless hours."

β€” Verified User Review

Business Impact

2020: Acquired by Autodesk

"Pype's best-in-class submittals and project closeout software will strengthen Autodesk Construction Cloud to help GCs, specialty contractors and owners further reduce risk and increase efficiencies." β€” Autodesk Press Release

Reflection

Key Learnings & Growth

What I Learned

In retrospect, I feel this exercise wasn't exactly what the Stakeholder expected because I aimed towards thinking about the whole ecosystem instead of just the single product itself (and probably failed on communicating it sufficiently in the beginning).

Process Improvements for Future Projects

Design Outcome

Due to the flawless collaboration, after the workshops hardly any revisions were required, neither in information architecture nor in visual design.

Despite early communication challenges, the collaborative workshop approach led to excellent outcomes with minimal post-workshop revisions, demonstrating the value of getting alignment through structured activities.

Impact on My Career

This experience was formative in several ways:

Design Viewer